“Changes to logic and configurations happen without a security check or record.”

Know what changed, why, and who approved it

Uncontrolled changes are a common cause of both security gaps and operational incidents. A lightweight security review keeps changes fast while keeping them visible.

Why it matters

Hidden exposure

A temporary rule or connection can become permanent.

Stale records

Inventories and drawings drift when changes aren't recorded.

Incident response

Responders need to know what changed recently.

Compliance

Change control is required by most OT frameworks.

A structured approach

A sequence that can be adapted to your environment and scope.

  1. Request

    Capture the change, affected assets and reason.

  2. Review

    Answer security impact questions for the change type.

  3. Approve

    Route to the right owner, including emergency changes.

  4. Verify

    Confirm the result and remove temporary measures.

  5. Update

    Update inventory, drawings and risk records.

What you end up with

  • Security-reviewed change records
  • Up-to-date asset and architecture data
  • Emergency change follow-up
  • An audit trail for reviews

Illustrative example

Hypothetical

A firewall rule is opened for a historian upgrade. The change record sets an expiry date, and verification after the upgrade confirms the rule was removed.

Frequently asked questions

Does OT change control slow down maintenance?

It shouldn't. A short set of security questions per change type, with a defined emergency path, adds minutes rather than days.

Facing this situation?

Describe where you are today and we'll suggest a practical way forward.

Request a consultation